PDA

View Full Version : NHRA Knee-jerk reaction?


MGM1979
July 7th, 2008, 5:15pm
Hot topic at the track on the 4th...I'm still undecided about how I feel - initial thoughts were it's a knee-jerk reaction to tragedy with little to no intended effect (NHRA already has a pretty impeccable safety record).


In interim measure, Top Fuel, Funny Car to race 1,000 feet


As the investigation continues into the tragic accident that took the life of driver Scott Kalitta, NHRA has announced that beginning at the Mopar Mile High Nationals in Denver, Colo., both the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes will race to 1,000 feet instead of the traditional 1,320 feet or one-quarter mile. This is an interim step that is being taken while NHRA continues to analyze and determine whether changes should be made to build upon the sport's long standing safety record, given the inherent risks and ever-present dangers associated with the sport.

This interim change was made by NHRA in collaboration with professional race teams. NHRA believes that racing the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes to 1,000 feet will allow NHRA and the racing community time to evaluate, analyze and implement potential changes based on the safety initiatives outlined last week.

With the change, fans will still be able to enjoy the sights, sounds and thrill of NHRA nitro racing with speeds around 300 mph and quick elapsed times to 1,000 feet.

Over the years, NHRA has implemented many initiatives to enhance safety including measures to limit speeds from increasing, personal protective gear, vehicle improvements, and track enhancements such as sand traps, catch nets and concrete barriers the entire length of the drag strip.

In the wake of the tragic series of events that took Kalitta's life, the following technical issues are currently under investigation: 1) what might be done to reduce engine failures; 2) parachute mounting techniques and materials as well as identifying a parachute material that could be more fire resistant; 3) exploring whether there is a way to increase brake efficiency when cars lose downforce due to the loss of the body; 4) analyzing additional methods that might be developed at the top end of the race track to help arrest runaway vehicles; 5) considering whether current speeds should be further limited or reduced to potentially improve safety.

“The board members of the Professional Racers Owners Organization (PRO) wholeheartedly and unanimously support this decision,” said its president Kenny Bernstein. “We want to thank NHRA for listening to our input and suggestions to incorporate these changes. It is not lost on any of us that this constitutes a change in our history of running a quarter-mile, but it's the most immediate adjustment we can make in the interest of safety which is foremost on everyone's mind. This may be a temporary change and we recognize it is not the total answer. We will continue to work hand in hand with NHRA to evaluate other methods of making Top Fuel and Funny Car competition safer so that we might return to our quarter-mile racing standard. We also want to thank Connie Kalitta for his invaluable input. He has been a rock through these difficult times.”

bc3tech
July 7th, 2008, 5:55pm
hm. interesting news for sure. From what i read here it just sounds like they're doing this as a "buffer" while they try and figure out something more permanent. as long as it really does get re-evaluated in the future after something else is done, i don't disagree.

edit: i just went and watched it all again and the only thing i can think that would have maybe done something is a fire-retardant parachute but i'm sure they already are. it just looks like the chute gets demolished so i don't know what else they can really do as far as safety goes. like you said the NHRA, for the sport that it is and what's actually being done on those tracks, has an impeccable safety record.

BlackChrome
July 8th, 2008, 2:18am
They should just race to the 1/8 mile. With these cars, it's over by then anyway. Who ever gets the best launch and 60ft is almost always the winner.

bc3tech
July 8th, 2008, 10:21am
They should just race to the 1/8 mile. With these cars, it's over by then anyway. Who ever gets the best launch and 60ft is almost always the winner.
i can't imagine a TF or FC going to 1/8mi, the times would be like 0.87! :eek:

MGM1979
July 8th, 2008, 10:59am
a top fuel race only 1/8th mile long would most certainly leave the crowd in a state of premature ejaculation...all the build-up with the long burnouts and 30 seconds to back them up before they creep up to the line, then the tree lights up and you hear the engine roar and cut-out as soon as it peaks - 3 seconds later. :shrug:

As with baseball, I'm a purist, I guess...NHRA is 1/4 mi. period.

bc3tech
July 8th, 2008, 12:55pm
yeah i'm with you on all that which is why i say as long as the 1000' is temporary it's ok... but i still don't know wtf you could really do to prevent what happened to Kalitta - sometimes your number's just up.

I always thought, though, that NHRA-sanctioned tracks had to have a sand pit at the end of them? I know MIR does.... and it didn't look like there was anything but wall at the end of the track where kalitta died....

MGM1979
July 8th, 2008, 3:15pm
yeah i'm with you on all that which is why i say as long as the 1000' is temporary it's ok... but i still don't know wtf you could really do to prevent what happened to Kalitta - sometimes your number's just up.

I always thought, though, that NHRA-sanctioned tracks had to have a sand pit at the end of them? I know MIR does.... and it didn't look like there was anything but wall at the end of the track where kalitta died....

Fontana has one, I almost put the RL in it when the ABS was acting up with the slicks...

the track in NJ has one as well, but I've read it's not very long...you'll notice at the end of the tape a lot of dirt/dust is kicked up just prior to the major impact.

bc3tech
July 8th, 2008, 4:49pm
I say we start a contest. Whoever comes up w/ the best idea for the NHRA resolving this issue wins.

MGM1979
July 8th, 2008, 7:18pm
dude - done...

longer and deaper sand trap, much like what would be found for a runaway truck on a downhill slope (but where the runaway truck ramp is actually inclined to help absorb some of the speed energy) coupled with the NASCAR safetey barriers along the entire length of the track. I'll even throw in some of those big ol' water energy absorbing thingies at the VERY end of the sand pit (much rather hit that then a concrete wall/pole.

Best part - we're not talking a WHOLE lot of renovation costs (with the exception of adding the safety barriers, which will probably entail moving the existing concrete walls back a couple feet. The sand pit modifications could be done by trucking in some dirt, sand, and rounded gravel with the most involved part being the construction of the retaining wall for the incline. Water-filled energy abosorbing system shouldn't be too pricey either.

I'd guess, each and every track could have the renovations done over the off-season and come in under $500,000 - obviously the colder climate tracks will have the most issues with weather delays, but it could be done. I would think that the NHRA could even step up and organize some sort of cost-sharing program since EVERY track would be required to complete the same renovations.

what do I win?

Doc
July 8th, 2008, 7:24pm
Continue to run 1320 feet and make sure you have a better shut down area to include a runoff area. :D I win /thread

Cat Ion
July 9th, 2008, 6:18am
You both are hosers! I say they implant sensors and pumps in the tires that detects if they aren't below a certain speed before a certain marker that the pump puts helium in the back tires and lifts the car off the ground and lands it safely in happy happy land! The end!